Star Crusaders Star Crusaders
  Index Page >> About Us >> Place Your Link >> Security & Privacy >> Terms of Service >> Submit Article
Search:   
Add Url
 

Health & Therapy

Computers & Software

Art & Culture

Companies & Business

Home & Garden

Realty & Property

Fashion & Lifestyle

Automobile & Automotive

Self Management

Academics & Learning

Malls & Shopping

Children & Teens

Outdoor & Sports

Society & Communities

Eating & Drinking

Medical Care

Science & Research

Government & Politics

Recreation & Entertainment

Finance & Investment

Travel & Vacation

Employment & Careers

News & Media

Indoor Games

 

  Index Page » Companies & Business » Business Administration
   
 

To Team or Not To Team

   
Everyone thinks teams are a good thing. Leaders like to form teams. People, for the most part believe in the value and purpose of teams . . .

All of us are smarter than each of us.

1 + 1 = 3

. . . are just two common phrases that reinforce and prove how pervasive our belief in teams is.

And that belief is justified.

Sometimes.

There are many times in our civic or church groups, and in our businesses and professional associations that we need teams of people to work on an issue or a project. And sometimes we would be better off without a team - with individuals contributing as individuals.

What?

No team?

You got it.

At least not the type of team you probably think of, when you think of a team.

Two Basic Types of Teams

To keep things simple, I believe there are two basic types of teams. There are basketball teams and there are track and field teams.

Basketball Teams

Basketball teams (or soccer or hockey) are teams that require, by the nature of their task, that everyone play as one unit. On teams in these sports the players are interdependent. At any moment of any game, in order to be successful, the entire team needs to be working in harmony. The role of each player is designated by their position (which takes into account their innate strengths and acquired skills). However, the situation at any moment during the flow of the game, may require any player to take any role.

And on good teams of this sort, all players are willing to be flexible, to assist, to change roles, to 'do what it takes'. Because they know that without working together, they can't achieve their team goals of victory. The nature of the game forces interdependency among the team members.

Track and Field Teams

Players on track and field teams on the other hand (except in a few relay events) are not interdependent, they are independent. Shot putters have a skill set that is largely unrelated to the sprinters. And the high jumpers can be personally skilled and successful without any tangible help or support from the distance runners.

At the end of the day (or meet), the team can win if enough of the individuals do well. In other words if enough individuals win, the team will win. The most successful of these teams will have highly talented individual contributors, supporting each other to reach their common goal of winning. In this way they are definitely a team. They may feel allegiance to the group. They certainly can have pride in being a part of the group. They want each other to be successful. They know that they can all be more successful when each individual is more successful. They can have a common goal (to win the meet or championship). But the fundamental relationship between the players isn't the same as it is on a basketball team.

What This Means to Us

In our organizations we most likely have both sorts of teams. We have teams that work in a process flow or project where the outputs of one person directly affect the work of the nextwhere the work and the people are highly interdependent.

We also have teams that look more like the track and field team. In these situations people are working toward a common mission and goal, but their work doesn't intersect in nearly the same ways as for the highly interdependent teams.

Fair enough you say.

But in my experience, we tend to want all teams to think they are basketball teams. If the work or project dictates that focus, great. But if you have a track and field (independent) team, you don't need the same focus on interdependence and traditional 'team building' activities.

What Do We Do Now?

If you lead a team or form teams or are just a member of a team, you need to think about and talk about this distinction. Determine across the team (or future team) what type of team you are. Once there is agreement on the type of team you are, you can begin to set the right kinds of expectations for each other and for yourself. You can build more appropriate plans for training, development and team building.

Knowing which type of team your work or project dictates is the first step towards helping that group of people be more successful and the work being done successfully.

So maybe it isn't really, 'to team or not to team'?, but 'which type of team'?

. . . that is the question.

Answer that one first. And, using the answer as a guide, watch all of your teams be more successful.

Author: Kevin
 
Author Bio:

Kevin Eikenberry is the Chief Potential Officer of The Kevin Eikenberry Group (KevinEikenberry.com) and author of Vantagepoints on Learning and Life. To read more stories like the one above or order your copy of the book visit www.vantagepoints.net or contact Kevin at (317) 387-1424 or toll free 888.LEARNER.

This article can be searched using: project management, risk management, small business administration, performance management
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Keeping Your Cool When The Customer Gets Hot
 
Press Release System for Free Advertising
 
Public Relations and Window Washing Companies
 
Profit Explosion
 
Optimizing BPM And Six Sigma or BPI
 
Envelope Stuffing
 
Seeking Disagreement - How We Use Questions To Get More Commitment, Learning And Better Results
 
Four More Hypnotic Selling Techniques
 
Artists, Freelancers, SubContractors, & Creative Folks: Dealing With A Bad Client
 
AOL Gives Up The Ghost
 
 
 
 

Video Chatting tips

Chatting can be full of fun and enjoyment.It is easy to do and you get to know interesting people fr ... - Angela_S
 

Intercultural Synergy in Mergers & Acquisitions

The rates of international mergers and acquisitions continue to increase yet the success rates do no ... - Neil Payne
 

The Role of Cultural Due Diligence in Business Integration Efforts

Due Diligence is a phrase that has been traditionally used to reflect the analysis activities that o ... - Debbie Imboden
 
 

The Values Of Home Business

Thanks to the Internet the home business segment has witnessed some extensive advertising and all th ... - Ryan Ginster
 

Management Of Change - Keep Things As They Are

Management of change is not seldom focused on finding new structures. Try to postpone this and reap ... - Hans Bool
 

Top Ten Blunders Exhibitors Make in Expos/Tradeshows

Triple your response from expos by avoiding the top ten blunders at expos. Turn disappointment into ... - Minesh Baxi
 

How to Select the Best Factoring Finance Company for Your Business

Selecting the factoring finance company that can best help you company is vital ensuring your compan ... - Marco Terry
 

Affiliate Marketing: Persistence Pays

Do you find that you are switching from one affiliate program to the next best ever offer, not persi ... - ronpass
 
 
Index Page >> Security & Privacy >> Terms of Service
Copyright © 2006-2008 www.starcrusaders.com - All Rights Reserved.