Ive always felt that those who criticize money, who deride people who have amassed it through their own toil and brains, dont know what theyre talking about.

Before they condemn those who succeed in obtaining it, they should try it out for themselves.

Make a fortune or two, and then weigh in with an opinion as to which condition you prefer, wealth or its alternatives.

Having money is just one measure of wealth, anyway. There are people who arrange not to need money, and I believe they can also be considered rich.

For example, take a college professor who is provided free or subsidized housing at a private university's ocean-facing campus. He enjoys a multi-million dollar view at a fraction of the price.

And while he doesnt own anything and he achieves no traditional price appreciation, his asset, the use of the dwelling, does become a more valuable perk with each passing semester.

He doesnt have to kill himself to earn the mortgage money on a similarly situated, private residence, located across the street. He can do what he loves, be a teacher, and not need big money to have an amazing life and lifestyle.

There are other examples of people who are rich, without having any money of their own.

The curator of a beautiful, small gem of a museum spends most of her waking hours surrounded by beauty. She eats in a subsidized cafeteria, drives a car paid for by her organization, and travels far and wide, expenses paid, to acquire more art for her employer.

By having money, officially wealthy people dont have to worry about the need to make money.

If you can figure out how to take a vacation from money, then youve joined this fraternity, by unlocking the real benefit to being wealthy.